|
|
Problems discussed at the
regional meeting
1.
Approaches to fundraising based on the psychology of
people living in a developing country:
=> charity
services rather than financial donations (due to
the shortage of free money even in sufficiently rich
organizations and absence of tax concessions
for organizations that provide financial help);
=> preferred
direct help to a certain child rather than help
via the hospital or fundraising organization
(because the of distrust in the "so-called free" medical
service and the opinion that charity organizations
are actually of no help to anybody);
=> preferred
way of helping by directly providing the required
medicines, clothes, food, or services rather than money
(because of distrust in parents and organizations).
2. Work with companies
whose production provokes oncological diseases (cigarettes,
artificial food additives, etc.) but which are willing to
provide sponsorship to children with oncological diseases.
(Under the conditions when there is a constant shortage
of medicines and a need for several marrow transplantations
each year, it would be virtually impossible to explain to the
parents and medical staff if we refused to take this money.)
3. Enlightening activities
in the atmosphere of almost total ignorance in the sphere
of oncological diseases, official policy of concealing these
diagnoses, fear of cancer, social taboos on any information
concerning oncology, negative attitude of the state and
the majority of the population to gravely ill and
disabled persons.
4. Arrangement of relationships
with the medical staff and protection of the child's and patient's
rights (established by international legal documents) in the
atmosphere of general legal ignorance.
5. Organization of volunteer work:
opposition of medical staff and arrogance of volunteers.
6. Absence of mobile communication
(doctor-to-doctor, doctor-to-parent, parent-to-parent, etc.),
lack of understanding in the problem of buying the necessary
means (Internet, cellular phones, etc.).
7. Rehabilitation of children and
their families.
8. Education and professional skills
of children who survived after cancer.
9. Joint projects (with foreign
and FSU organizations): the possibility of improving the situation
(various aspects of our work) and receiving financing for
the work of our organizations.
10. The role of religion (church)
in the treatment and rehabilitation of children with cancer.
11. Changing the public opinion
on children with cancer.
Photographs
In Peterhof, near one of the fountains.
Renata Ravich (Moscow), Gerlind Bode (Germany), and
Marianne Naafs-Wilstra (the Netherlands) are admiring the rainbow
gleaming in the sprinkling water without noticing that they
are in its beams themselves.
During the meeting. Nina Kostyukova
(town of Severodvinsk) is telling about her organization
"Triunity".
At work during the meeting. Renata Ravich, Veronika (SPb),
Marianne, Nina Kostikova, Tatiana Stankova (Volgograd).
Rita Galipova (Chelyabinsk) and
Nadezhda (SPb).
At the Oncohematology Department of the
Center for Advanced Medical Technologies. The participants
of the meeting are speaking with Dr. M.B. Belogurova,
Head of Department.
At the playroom of the department.
Marianne is speaking to Marina, who is under treatment here.
Project:
Creation of Parent Organizations at the Territory of the CIS
and Creating of Training Network for Working with Volunteers
ROO "Children and Parents Against Cancer"
Aim: to improve the quality of life
for children with cancer and their families.
Tasks: creation of a training (volunteer groups)
network for working with volunteers, creation of a network
of parent organizations.
Activities: training of parents, psychologists,
doctors, and volunteers; organization of seminars, conferences,
and charity actions; probation of regional representatives
at ROO "Children and Parents Against Cancer".
Starting point: implementation of the project "Helping
Children with Oncological Diseases As Seen by Two Countries:
Russia - Finland"; study of the experience of the
Sulva organization (Finland) concerning various directions
of working with children suffering from oncological
diseases and with their families.
Planned participants: representatives of parent
organizations from St. Petersburg, Volgograd, Severodvinsk,
Chelyabinsk, Novosibirsk, Simferopol (Ukraine).
Result: creation of a training (volunteer groups)
network for working with volunteers; creation of a network
of parent organizations; creation of a journal or newspaper.
|
|
|
|
The first international meeting of representatives
of parent organizations from Eastern Europe was held
in St. Petersburg on August 14, 2004, Saturday.
It took place under the patronage of the
International
Confederation of Childhood Cancer Parent Organisations (ICCCPO).
ROO "Children and Parents Against Cancer" and its executive
director Katerina Kiseleva received the participants of the
meeting in their office.
|
|
The foreign colleagues who visited us were
Marianne Naafs-Wilstra, executive director of the
Dutch childhood cancer parent organization, and
Gerlind Bode, executive director of the German Leukemia
Foundation. Other participants of the meeting
came from Volgograd, Severodvinsk, Chelyabinsk,
and Simferopol (Ukraine).
|
|
All guests told about the experience of their organizations
and specificity of work in their regions. In the first half
of the day, the discussion concerned the work of the
organizations with parents, doctors, sponsors, and authorities,
as well as associated problems. The problem of fundraising in parent
organizations and recruiting new professionals and volunteers at
various levels evoked a lively response and active exchange of views.
|
|
As a result of the discussion, plans for the nearest future were outlined:
1) to exchange the results of the meeting; to develop the principles
of joint work;
2) to organize and implement an interregional project;
3) to create and issue a joint electronic periodical (newspaper or
journal);
4) to develop the Working Code for Parent Organizations;
5) to create a Web site presenting the participants of the meeting;
6) to create an interregional network (this idea was earnestly
supported by all participants of the meeting);
7) to prepare an action "Resources for Parent Organizations",
which would include a number of seminars and trainings concerning
fundraising, information resouces, and volunteer work
(for groups of parents, doctors, and volunteers).
Our foreign colleagues were deeply impressed by the work
of Russian and Ukrainian organizations. They confessed that
they had encountered the same problems when creating their
parent organizations 20 years ago:
=> lack of financing,
=> shortage of volunteers,
=> public opinion, which rejected open discussion
of cancer,
=> lack of information,
=> poor mutual understanding of doctors and parents,
=> lack of contacts between organizations that represent
the same region (the same country).
Most Russian and Ukrainian parent organizations started their
work 6 or 7 years ago, but, as our foreign colleagues said,
achieved outstanding positive results in this short time.
This is why we can hope that together we will be able to do even
more.
|
In fact, the discussion started as early as on Friday, in
a bus, when our guests were going sightseeing to Peterhof and
Tsarskoe Selo, suburbs of St. Petersburg. On Friday evening,
there was a festive dinner, and its participants also
enthusiastically spoke about their work.
|
|
Therefore, when we officially met on Saturday morning,
we instantly resumed our discussion of the topics that concerned
all of us. It turned out that each region has its own problems
in addition to our common problems. And, by the way, the participants
of the meeting consulted each other on the possible ways of solving
these problems.
When we discussed the problem of contacts with the authorities,
all the participants reacted very emotionally. And everybody
supported the opinion that our organizations should enjoy
full rights as partners in relations with the authorities
at various levels. By the way, if an association of Russian
parent organizations could be created in the future, this
would help us solve our problems at the highest level.
Our foreign colleagues praised this meeting very highly:
according to them, our organizations showed that now they
have reached a fundamentally new level in their development.
|
|
IMPRESSIONS
OF THE MEETING
Evgeni Novitski,
The Overcoming Mission
Simferopol, Crimea, Ukraine
|
So, the two days of our St. Petersburg meeting have passed.
Indeed, two days, although the program mentioned only one
working day, August 14. But active and diverse work also took place
during the previous day, on August 13: first during the journey
to Peterhof and Tsarskoe Selo, then in the restaurant, and finally
at the hotel. And I must say that the "corridor conversations"
were almost as fruitful as the worktime.
The meeting was a success, no doubt about it. I'll try to
sum up its results that were the most important for myself.
Firstly, I personally saw my co-workers whom I had previously
known only by mail or had just theoretically known about their
existence.
Secondly, our exchange of the working experience was extremely
rich and helpful. In particular, we shared our ideas and practice
concerning the organization of charity actions.
|
So it happened that Maria Batova,
who initiated and organized the Crimean Nights series
of concerts, was in St. Petersburg at the same time.
The participants of the meeting invited
Maria to participate in our work.
|
|
I must say that the experience accumulated by other
societies was sometimes so different from ours that at
first we just could not understand each other: we needed
some time to clarify the meaningful details and to
agree on the terminology. Actually, those assembled round
the table at our meeting represented two large groups;
in my mind, I called them West and East.
The "Westerners" pay most attention to individual
membership in their organizations and rely mostly on
themselves, without any illusions about the authorities.
They help the families with whom they establish bilateral
relationships, and this help is mostly individual. They
exist under the conditions of information openness, where
an oncological diagnosis is usually known both to
the child and to the society. They actively use or try
to use contemporary information technologies.
As to the "Easterners", they usually remain faithful
to the traditional collectivism. They work as global
organizations, which by definition include all families
where a child falls ill with an oncological disease.
In their work, they have to go through long and difficult
fighting in order to receive recognition from the authorities -
and the amazing thing is that they gradually receive it,
and then also get certain help and cooperation from the official
structures. The main form of assistance is not
individual (although it is also present) but social: creation
of rehabilitation centers, camps, workshops; help to hospitals
in buying medicines and equipment for all patients; etc.
They have gained working experience under the conditions
where announcing the diagnosis in public is difficult or
impossible. To make up for the lack of information technologies,
they communicate with the press, book publishing companies, etc.
(Here I must stress that the naming of these two
groups is more or less arbitrary. Actually, the work of
Western European organizations combines both forms, but
in our reality they are differentiated between the two
aforementioned poles. It might seem that European societies
are even closer to the second model, because they are trying
to cover the widest social groups, retain close contact
with government agencies, etc. However, the style of thinking,
the priorities, the values in the West are oriented at
everybody's individuality rather than at the society as a whole.
A personality is by definition more valuable than a community.
This was easily seen during our meeting.).
Evidently, both groups have something to learn from each
other. I think that mutual visits and
(planned or spontaneous) meetings would be perfect for such
learning during practical communication.
Thirdly, this meeting marked the beginning of our
common existence in a united Web space.
We have already started to implement the decision about the
creation of an information network: our Mission promised
to integrate the addresses of Russian organizations that
participated in the meeting into the existing information network
uniting similar Ukrainian organizations (both parent and volunteer
ones).
Then, we planned a joint project on resources for parent
organizations. In our opinion, this is another wonderful
chance to share the strong sides of our experience with each
other.
At the same time, doubtlessly, the weak point of the meeting
was that only several Russian and one Ukrainian organization
were among its Eastern European participants. But this did not
depend on the ICCCPO or on the receiving party. It is just
a pity that representatives of some organizations could not
participate because of their circumstances and others were
not active enough.
|
|
The possibility to visit the Child Oncohematology
Department at the Center for Advanced Medical Technologies
and to see its head Dr. Margarita B. Belogurova
was very valuable for me.
|
Thank you, Marianne and Gerlind. Thank you, Katerina Kiseleva
and all our friends from St. Petersburg for this chance to meet
each other!
|